🔗 Share this article

Increasing concerns exist over the chance of armed conflict among East African neighbors, the Ethiopian government and the Eritrean government, as aggressive language has intensified in the past few weeks.

What Did Ethiopian Officials Stated?

Ethiopia's, being landlocked, requests for entry to the maritime outlet through Eritrea has sparked a heated rhetorical conflict.

The Ethiopian leader initially stated publicly in last year that his country's sea access was an crucial concern, statements that Eritrean authorities rejected.

Ties between the two countries have regularly been difficult. Following a decades-long struggle for freedom, the Eritrean state, which has a 1,350km (840-mile) sea border, formally separated from Ethiopia in the early 1990s, making it cut off from the sea.

Five years later, a territorial conflict erupted in which numerous people died.

Recent Statements from Ethiopian Government

Prime Minister Abiy and military leader the army commander have openly claimed sovereignty of Eritrea's southern port of the port of Assab – approximately 60 kilometers from the frontier - and implied the intention to seize it militarily.

On 1 September, the Prime Minister said the country's "mistake" of losing access to the Red Sea as a result of Eritrea secession would be "corrected soon".

Ethiopia's ambassador to Kenya, ex-military officer Bacha, said that the port was "belonging to Ethiopia" and would be given back "by force".

Eritrean Answer to the Statements

Amid persistent threats from Ethiopian officials, Eritrea's response has been limited to short statements on X from Information Minister Yemane Gebremeskel.

He has rejected Ethiopia's demand for access to the Red Sea calling it "dangerous" and a "negative policy" of "territorial claims" – a policy of retaking lost territory.

Eritrean authorities alerted on 16 September that efforts to legitimise "flagrant aggression" would have major implications for Ethiopia and its neighbouring countries and is a "boundary that should not be crossed|violated|breached".

Defense Preparations on the Border

Currently, there are no reports of significant troop deployments in the frontier regions between the neighboring states.

Nevertheless, in the country, government media has displayed training completions of numerous trainees at various military training camps.

The leader of staff section of the military, the officer, recently said in an interview that the military was in a "reliable position" as "tens of thousands of youths" were joining it, which he said was "a signal to our adversaries".

Previous Origins of the Conflict

For over fifty years from 1890, the territory was governed by colonial powers.

Following the end of Italian rule, it was then controlled by the UK forces before evolving into a associated territory of Ethiopia.

Yet in the early 1960s the Ethiopian emperor terminated this system and the region became completely integrated into the Ethiopian state.

A three-decade long armed struggle occurred, concluding with the government's loss in the early 1990s. Autonomy was then approved by Eritreans in a referendum in 1993.

For a few years in the 1990s, there were friendly connections between the governments in Ethiopia's capital and Eritrea's capital, but they fell out over the precise positioning of their shared boundary, causing conflict in 1998.

Though this finished in a ceasefire agreement in 2000, it was partially applied, and the both countries remained at in dispute.

This situation improved in 2018, when the Prime Minister made gestures to Eritrean President the president. The both leaders agreed to a announcement that the war was finished – a action that earned Abiy the prestigious award.

The both administrations were then cooperators in the country's previous armed struggle in Tigray.

But diplomatic connections have later worsened again.