🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.